• using R Under development (unstable) (2024-11-09 r87314)
• using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
• R was compiled by     clang version 19.1.3     flang-new version 19.1.3
• running under: Fedora Linux 36 (Workstation Edition)
• using session charset: UTF-8
• using option ‘--no-stop-on-test-error’
• checking for file ‘asht/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
• checking extension type ... Package
• this is package ‘asht’ version ‘1.0.1’
• checking package namespace information ... OK
• checking package dependencies ... OK
• checking if this is a source package ... OK
• checking if there is a namespace ... OK
• checking for executable files ... OK
• checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
• checking for portable file names ... OK
• checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
• checking whether package ‘asht’ can be installed ... [23s/30s] OK See the install log for details.
• checking installed package size ... OK
• checking package directory ... OK
• checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
• checking top-level files ... OK
• checking for left-over files ... OK
• checking index information ... OK
• checking package subdirectories ... OK
• checking code files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
• checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
• checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
• checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
• checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
• checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
• checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
• checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK
• checking use of S3 registration ... OK
• checking dependencies in R code ... OK
• checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
• checking replacement functions ... OK
• checking foreign function calls ... OK
• checking R code for possible problems ... [39s/53s] OK
• checking Rd files ... NOTE checkRd: (-1) signTest.Rd:29: Lost braces     29 | code{stat="ud"} gives 0, and \code{stat="cpp"} gives 0.5).        | ^ checkRd: (-1) simulateSS.Rd:46: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?     46 | and the total number of batches, $b_{tot}$.        | ^ checkRd: (-1) simulateSS.Rd:48: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?     48 | Then we use a normal approximation to estimate the target sample size, say $N_{norm}$. In step 2, we replicate $m$ data sets with sample size $N_2 = N_{norm}$        | ^ checkRd: (-1) simulateSS.Rd:48: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?     48 | Then we use a normal approximation to estimate the target sample size, say $N_{norm}$. In step 2, we replicate $m$ data sets with sample size $N_2 = N_{norm}$        | ^ checkRd: (-1) simulateSS.Rd:49: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?     49 | to get the associated proportion of rejections, say $P_2$. We repeat 2 more batches with $N_3=N_{norm}/2$ and $N_4=2 N_{norm}$,        | ^ checkRd: (-1) simulateSS.Rd:49: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?     49 | to get the associated proportion of rejections, say $P_2$. We repeat 2 more batches with $N_3=N_{norm}/2$ and $N_4=2 N_{norm}$,        | ^ checkRd: (-1) simulateSS.Rd:51: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?     51 | the sample size at the target power, $N_{target}$. We use that estimate of $N_{target}$ for our sample size for the next        | ^ checkRd: (-1) simulateSS.Rd:51: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?     51 | the sample size at the target power, $N_{target}$. We use that estimate of $N_{target}$ for our sample size for the next        | ^ checkRd: (-1) simulateSS.Rd:53: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?     53 | Wu (1985, see Section 3). Step 4 is iterative, for the $i$th batch we repeat the isotonic regression, except now with $N_i$ estimated from the first $(i-1)$ observation pairs. We repeat step 4 until either the number of batches is $b_{tot}$,        | ^ checkRd: (-1) simulateSS.Rd:56: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?     56 | current sample size estimate, otherwise add 1. Continue with that up-and-down-like method until we reach the number of batches equal to $b_{tot}$. The up-and-down-like method was added because sometimes the algorithm would get stuck in too large of a sample size estimate.        | ^
• checking Rd metadata ... OK
• checking Rd line widths ... OK
• checking Rd cross-references ... OK
• checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
• checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
• checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
• checking Rd contents ... OK
• checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
• checking contents of ‘data’ directory ... OK
• checking data for non-ASCII characters ... OK
• checking data for ASCII and uncompressed saves ... OK
• checking examples ... [14s/20s] OK
• checking PDF version of manual ... [9s/17s] OK
• checking HTML version of manual ... OK
• checking for non-standard things in the check directory ... OK
• checking for detritus in the temp directory ... OK
• DONE

Status: 1 NOTE